Recently got into a ridiculous argument with “Stuart” on The Standard. I think he was a rabid National supporter, who thought everything was awesome. So these were some links to demonstrate the non awesomeness of our corporatised world.
NZ Listener, May 1-7 2010 Vol 223 No 3651
Cover Story: “All Things Being Equal”
by Staff Writers
New Zealanders once prided themselves on being an egalitarian society, but research shows we not only tolerate increasing income disparity but appear to welcome it.
The usual posters of the Solar system miss out the largest, most significant part: all the empty space. This interactive page puts it back into correct perspective, and adds some thoughtful commentary along the journey to Pluto.
From the Daily Mirror:
Viking warriors have begun to arrive in York in preparation for the end of the world.
‘Norsemen’ from across the UK and further afield are converging on the historic Yorkshire town as Ragnarok, the final bloody battle predicted in Norse mythology approaches on February 22.
Believers say that when the fateful day arrives Earth will split open, unleashing the inhabitants of Hel.
The wolf, Fenrir, son of Loki, will break out of his prison and the Midgard snake Jormungand will rise from the sea.
Nidhogg, the dragon of the underworld, will gnaw at the world tree, Yggdrasil, until it groans and wilts.
Then as the ice giants of Jotunheim come thundering over the horizon, the dead heroes of Valhalla will descend from heaven to fight them.
Some of the weirder comments:
# Key said, “I have no more comment on this matter. Now I have some basking to do.”
# As Key turned to walk from the podium, he caught an errant fly in mid-air with his tongue before scurrying up the wall and into an air vent.
# Well, when writer/musician/jokester Shane Warbrooke (really?) is found face-down in a ditch, killed by a kind of venom heretofore unknown to mankind, it will be far too late to worry then…
# BTW, John Key is a lassez-faire capitalist and climate change skeptic, only pulled leftward in recent years on that second point by the fact that his nation has pulled in that direction in recent years [WTF?!]
I guess compared to teabaggers, gun nuts, and the corporate crony infested White House you might say that. But we can reasonably infer that our bankster PM made his 50 million by attacking the NZ dollar in the late 80s, causing huge damage to the economy. He’s following the neocon playbook and making it much easier for his corporate pals and giant banks to extract as much wealth as possible from the 99% of suckers. Goofy antics like this lizard joke are the mask of the smiling assassin.
Perhaps the most scathing and chillingly accurate article ever written about John Key.
Key might never have called Mandela a terrorist, but his 1980s apathy over apartheid is arguably more troubling for what it reveals about the shallow nature of his politics, and his very motivations for going into public service.
During the period when Key and others in the banking industry were making their fortunes, NZ went from being one of the most equal countries in the developed world to being one of the most unequal, a trend that is continuing under Key’s government. The OECD credits changes in taxation and labour law for the dramatic changes in the distribution of wealth.
Source: Huffington Post
There is a seriously paranoid subculture within Christianity that rejects science and embraces conspiracy theories in order to support a naive literal reading of the book of Genesis wherein the Earth is only 6000 years old, Noah’s Flood was a global deluge, and man walked with dinosaurs. No wonder Colin Craig is confused about climate change, chemtrails and moon landings (satire is hardly needed in this case).
Appearances and measurements lie. Trees lie. Carbon lies. Bones lie. The stars in the heavens lie. And nothing at all can be trusted from what we deceive ourselves into imagining we’re learning from observation, study, experiment and measurement.
Their claim is even more audacious than that. It has to be. They want to say that they’re only disputing the honesty of “science,” but if that were the case, then we could easily test their claim by, say, switching on the light or looking at this page on the Internet. Science seems to work. And thus the epistemological anarchists of young-Earth creationism cannot simply be asserting the unreliability of science, they must also assert the unreliability of seeming. If a universe that seems ancient is not ancient, then both the universe and our seeming must be lying. Nothing we think we see, hear, touch or measure can be trusted. Nothing can be known.[…]
These folks are demonstrably untrustworthy when it comes to their claims about the universe. It seems unwise, then, to regard them as wholly trustworthy when it comes to their claims about the Bible. It seems far likelier that their approach to the Bible is as reliable, thoughtful and defensible as their approach to the universe is — which is to say not at all.
Facebook interaction with a Young-Earther
(My comment, 1 December 2013):
Teaching that “evolution is contrary to the Bible” is a roadblock preventing intelligent people who understand science from coming to faith in Christ. Creationist claims have been debunked time and again (see talkorigins.org/indexcc/ ), but outfits like AIG/ICR continue to spread errors and misconceptions. This is not the message of the Gospel!
(Creationist reply, 2 December 2013):
Sorry Rob you obviously are brain washed and didn’t do your studies enough, otherwise you would know that creationists are scientists too and aren’t an embassment. that evolutionists arguments have been debunked far more than creationists. True science matches up with what the Bible says not the other way round. I think you are in error, and seriously doubt your faith.
I was subsequently blocked from further conversation and could not retrieve the comments I had made critiquing the creationist’s propaganda… lots of weird stuff about dragons and dinosaurs and how evolution has ‘collapsed’ or something. A sad case of the Dunning-Kruger effect, I’m afraid, exemplified by a basic misunderstanding and even suspicion of how science is done.